Applying the nature of biological life to science fiction. look in at the complex machine of life as a perpetual cellular statistic syntheses that is unthought of because of the negligence of justification of ignorance in a "common current thought" or social demographic. Creating fantasy in reality and reality in fantasy, turning a micro biologist in to a robot Doctor or Einstein in to a cyberpunk. Fantasy and reality intertwined to create hypothesis to what is beyond reality. To collaborate the perversity of a systematically corrupted generation that can find a higher consciousness through science and technology to procreate a more complex
"machine of life".
Friday, June 19, 2009
We are told that we live and thrive off material possessions and that we see nothing beyond that. It is bare instinct to kill and have a source of nourishment. That is the only reason why we kill. And that is one of that main ways to maintain a neutral equilibrium with the planet. I am not relating to modern times,I am saying,you kill something,it falls to the ground,the earth can absorb that,and use it again. I am saying that in "the new world",we would do all but through technology,you don't have to kill something to survive. you can use chemical binary compounds to create you own nourishment. Then it would not be a significant enough for it to be necessary to maintain a equilibrium. that is why I want to leave the world to something exceedingly superior to humans,(A.I.)..hence forth leaving the earth to logic,reason,and knowledge. It takes individual thought to create something good in a unindividual world(our world), but then again, if you have a different thought, YOU GET KILLED. A different perspective and greed, are the only two things that can make one person hate one other. And from that you need people like John Lennon, but for example,In the "NEW WORLD" you have to make EVERYONE like John Lennon, because that people that hate him are not like him, so those people can't exist. I said that freewill and individual thought was a burden to the progress and evolution of the human race(in the new world).I have observed how much freewill we reilly have. (ONE) of the main current problems is the government, the government has power over the economy,the economy is the one reason for social mobility,social mobility is what stop you and me and everyone like us to have NO POWER! Freewill is a selfish,materialistic thing that empowers every person to not feel bad about us killing and taking advantage of everything around us. I mentioned that the human race is the example of a virus. Like a cancer of the Earth,we live on the host that we unconsciously are killing. For example if you put a virus in a person would you give that sickness freewill?? Would you let it spread all thorough the body and eventually kill it? So, I just would like you to reconsider how much freewill we really have. God and gods are examples of the human desire to be observed and understood giving us a sense of mortality. Everything is a matter of opinion, you can not make a utopia with material possessions but you can make a utopia with the perspective of the person, that is why I think people have to have ONE perspective. I know how most people cant see past the material possessions rule there life. Personally, I don't care about what people should do. I have thought about what the economy dose to people and what good it is doing. I think the economy should have never been invented because,(logically perceived),the economy is literally stopping human technological advancement, and basic evolution. The two reasons for the economy is social mobility,and the right to have people work for you,now, in one sense they are the same thing because if you have people under you, in a social feudal system you have worked to gain power above them, and that is creating discord in human society. That gives people the right to look down on other people and makes people unequal, and their for, creating hate between two different social classes. And what I mean by it stopping human technological advancement, is that if there was no type of currency, every one would be able to indulge in any technological luxury, no matter what social class they are in because there would only be one. For example, if you take a fancy car, it would not be considered fancy because everyone would have the newest "cutting edge" technology and that would maintain an economic equilibrium. I have no hope of this happening because greed already exists, and people would take advantage. But if money never existed there would only be one reason to fight wars, and that would be individual thought.