tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-48560987609821521742024-03-13T08:23:27.241-07:00Ambiguous Hallucinations Of Our PerceptionsIntellectual observations of the nature of reality, and people.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-38913680344614310342011-02-24T17:39:00.000-08:002011-02-24T18:10:34.534-08:00Fact and FaithFact proliferates ambiguity, faith eradicates ambiguity. Perhaps this is the hubris of the faithful. The governing dynamics of a perceived objectivity of the soul given by faith ensures a afterlife, but why is faith so excessively advocated if it has no perceptible practical means. It occludes the mind from the physical, it gives a meticulous engineuity to the individual's meaning of life. If the idea of the soul is perpetuated and believed so passionately through the means of theology, then why is there always residual ambiguity in theology? <br /> Why is it so vital to the structural integrity of our society to assimilate these ideas? Perhaps we are trying to give the feeling of dying some kind of desperate personification to justify our fear of death, opposed to facing one's own mortality. Theses feelings lie within the profoundest depths of the human mind, and are rarely articulated, but every one seems to know the feeling. Perhaps it's an instinct thats engineered directly into our genetic signatures that habitually makes us fear death. <br /> Our internal disposition depends on faith, but that faith can be manipulated by information regarding what others feel, forcing the individual who's assimilating the information to contradict his own justification of life. <br /> Maybe theology is a means of manipulation, and perhaps we were never meant to verbalize these profound feelings.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-11642303953780402352010-02-06T12:52:00.000-08:002010-02-06T13:22:52.390-08:00Why are we here? The multitude of ideological rationalizations and justifications that are the foundation of masses of people being fixated on the idea of a God figure that is the aspiration that represents universal optimism that most people are fixated upon. Where did these ideological aspirations come from? We are intelligent life, but why do we have to have the support of an aspiration? It could be because we have emotional ambiguities and the unobjectionable fixation to rationalize the conditions around us. What we cannot discover though science we have to justify through fantasies that are replicated out of the delusional articulation of the universe. If anything, these ideological justifications are the obvious foundation of conflicting ramifications and have failed to reach an ideological utilization, but only ends with consistent belligerency between religions. That should be substantial evidence that humanity is destructive amongst each other for something that accumulates fear in the temporal subconscious that is expressed by deliberate belligerent behaviour amongst the opposing intellectual spectrum. The masses collaborate ideologies over something that is ambiguous and ambiguity creates fear, and fear creates conflict of interests of the central spectrum of thought. Perhaps fear is the reason for the perpetual belligerency and the foundation for the massive likelihood of a rationalization in each individuals mind because every individual has fear and fear is what forces the articulation of delusional and irrational justifications that eventually lead to collaborative ramifications that lead to a manifestation of belligerency that goes perpetually without relinquishment.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-3239314964500227782010-02-04T11:39:00.000-08:002010-02-04T16:04:42.833-08:00God Is Dead"God is dead" thus Nietzsche spoke, my interpretation of this insinuation is not the simple statement spoken by a atheistic nihilist, but a derogatory utterance of God being dead meaning the transgression of optimism by entering a state of complacency that fabricates temporal compression on massive demographics of people that are "hopeless" in every sense of the word. Thus it becomes the aspirational obligation of the prophet Zarathustra to strike the nucleus of this systematic neurosis that has particular emphasis on the profoundest depths of humanity. This realization of God's death incorporates a metamorphosis in the prophet and cures a selective multitude of individuals. If God died, what would that do to your unobjectionable affinity for optimism that you so passionately justify the universe with? I believe that the central spectrum of people chose to believe in God because of the inevitable ramifications of facing the suffering that every individual is obligated to endure in a life consistent to fluctuation. God is the aspiration that people use to rationalize and justify the ambiguous universe that we can only wonder and hypothesize the reason why we are all here. The Human consciousness is the neutralization of this persistent philosophical manifold of utilized ideas about the secrets that lie within the depths of humanity. Thus we preach amongst each other in the futile effort to establish an ultimate truth. The theological demographics of cerebral activity are obligated to collaborative ramifications that have residual belligerency. Two conflictive intellectual spectrums create a irrefutable manifestation of assiduous speculation towards each opposing delegation of the common current thought. They both distinguish the distinctive difference from each other through an intricate structure of duplicity. Singular stability of mutual aspirations to implement a meticulous distribution of thought. This replicates fixations of requisite exposition of a perceived justification of the external stimulus. Your beliefs may be opposed, but if your passionate about them you will defend them.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-32594338795235623492010-01-05T13:24:00.000-08:002010-01-19T11:18:15.404-08:00Paradox Of PerceptionWhile the notion remains resiliently assiduous,there is an unacknowledged systematic indignation and at an eventual point it will assimilate a prestigious synchronization to preclude it's relative negativity amongst the mutual thought of the scientific community. Virgin birth. The ambiguously sanctimonious virginal conception of the Central figure of Christianity has perpetuated a residual thought of possibility in my mind. When a child is conceived obviously two genetic signatures are required to procreate. If one genetic signature is replicated then it would make a genetically pure child that has an indistinguishable genetic signature from the mother. We are living in a residual paradox of tangible perception. The world as we know it, is only bio electrical signals assiduously interpreted by our brains. As the human brain has a habituation of the illumination and collaboration of the external stimulus, it is a filtration apparatus for the individual. We all perceive the world in different ways, therefore there is no absolute perceived residual reality. Like a pure perception of the world, it's like a genetically pure child of only one genetic signature. To purely perceive the world we would have to be in a sub-conscious dimension but in the same place. The genetic code of a child would be superimposed on by the collaboration of the two different genetic signatures. The perception of the world is obstructed by the limitations of the brain collaborated with the external stimulus. Pure perception is obstructed, like a pure genetic signature in a child.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-63209931160118906582010-01-01T17:20:00.000-08:002010-01-01T18:08:52.930-08:00Optimism Versus PessimismThe habituation of a perpetually administering stimulus superimposed by a meticulous indignation of a seemingly convalescent reality. Optimism versus pessimism. Each day our replicating quiescence is justified by the cruel means of reality. The alterations of our consciousness is obstructed by the miraculous religious justification of the supercilious but commonplace coincidences of every day life. The resolutely mutual justification of miracles are futile in every scene of our pessimistic reality. The individuals that have a representation of a rational delegation are morally prosecuted for a transgression of optimism. The zealously inert demographic have a sense of moderation in the perceived conditions of the matter. While each fastidious plane of thought creates a confrontational reaction, a delegation of opinion is yet to be influenced in an age of assimilation. If the fortunate occurrence of a delegated opinion is influenced, then there is a likely hood of it being frivolous and transparent to the opposing means of perception. The repression of the delegation of opinion would be immanent and very precise due to the opposite resolute opinion and would become a residual disobedience to the delegation. Or perhaps that's just my pessimism speaking?alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-82773725112236287752009-10-29T19:20:00.000-07:002009-11-04T17:51:17.142-08:00corinthian pillar of consciousnessResidual illumination of the collaboration of the obviousness of the truth that a conceptual hyperfuntional construct of our physiological binary compound of our tangible representation of this world. The will of the mind being the implementation of the Corinthian pillar of consciousness that creates a mutual aspersions of massive proportions. But what if those proportions where ultimately and insipidly insignificant? If outside our delegation of rationality,we are just particles of a grater whole and that whole is a massive electrical signal being carried by a neuron thew out the nerves system of the universe. If our entire means of our manipulated existence was to briefly support a sense of a colossal and ambiguous being. If we where an electrical signal,our entire biological evolution and existence through the means of perception of this colossal being would only be an instant and it would not ever know we existed at all. It would show our massive mutual selfishness and accumulation of optimism over the time realizing reality,that the time we spend at the shores of desire and comfort,beyond the clouds is no "spirit of knowledge" but an insipid means of existence.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-44108731008663438002009-10-24T12:26:00.000-07:002009-11-04T18:09:44.722-08:00Clockwork of manLook through the window of an ambiguous and sophisticatedly collaborated longevity of a perceived lifetime. Rationalized by a systematically distributed notion of time that resides indigenously in the massive mutual addiction to rationality that mathematically calculates the unknown. A rationally given by a subconscious stained by civil obedience that has left knowledge itself inconceivably mutated by a mutual civil corruption and primal lust for power. The clock can be a reflection of man. The clock,living out the perpetual occupational obligation given by it's creator and yet it's exceedingly internally sophisticated. The internal clockwork of man living in seemingly mutual civility while he is ignoring subconscious echos of his rationality following him through his bondage of obedience. The obedience given by a professional superior,parents,or god that indistinguishably dictates man as time dictates a clock.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-6769627357737758592009-08-11T15:43:00.000-07:002009-12-24T13:12:21.418-08:00Aspiration of sufferingI look at modern culture of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">medialization</span> to be a perpetual disappointment and as this <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">duplicitely</span> frivolous mind-state continues the more I think we all need a deliberate inconsistency to shake us out of our ignorant and superficial state of complacency, I believe that the human race is something that needs to be enlightened, I believe that we can become something better, we need to learn how to acknowledge what we unconsciously kill and take advantage of, we are all slaves of the mutual fixations of necessity of the feeble human intellect and the basic human persona. the perpetuation of our ignorance is what creates the vagaries of perception and persevering the discord of the human race. I <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">believe</span> in consciousness beyond biological life but not in the context of an aspiration giving observation or judgement or suffering.I <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">believe</span> that human consciousness can only be perpetuated in a state of mind but that is only the pursuit of happiness by the individual,not cruel judgement form a higher being. The thought of an aspiration created by the human psychology to acknowledge our desire of observation and judgement and to perpetuate the human justification of the universe. In my <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">opinion</span> this is not the case. I think our means of perceptions makes it so that we will never find out why we are here,we live in a world of endlessness the only thing that matters is that you are in the moment,that is the only way we can <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">perceive</span> the world in its best way,but we never will <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">truly</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">perceive</span> the world because everything we <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">sense</span> is just electrical signals interpreted by our brains. The mind is everything,everything is just what our <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">senses</span> are telling us,we will never go beyond what our brains are telling us. We will never know why we are here.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-15224496664201686122009-08-11T15:42:00.000-07:002009-08-11T15:43:29.142-07:00The ambiguous hallucination of our perceptions.Simple thought is exactly what creates the blatant disregard for basic human decency and creates a detestable image of human influence. Influence is what seeps in to the vary reality of any individual thought and makes your opinion exceedingly unequivocally not requisite of any pertinence. I believe that there is a genius in every one of us. Deep inside of our minds there is something waiting for it's callus exterior to be peeled away and have it's verging intelligence justified. The way to do that is to break our desperate dependency of our material possessions, to find recognition in our own minds, so we all can see past the ambiguous hallucination of our perceptions that is reality. So we can find a place in our minds that is without doubt or hesitation, so we can be like the arrow that springs from the bow. I realize that people who lack physiological individuality of or freedom of thought due to perpetuating ignorance of past generations, but they seem to belong to a demographic of a singular unconscious conciseness that I like to call the common current thought also known as "mainstream". Most of them are inert and hopelessly dependent on the systematically corrupted culture around them. They must relinquish their mistaken sense of identity and forget there residual self image and create something that can exceed there insipid means of existence.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-66665839346800245442009-07-17T16:24:00.000-07:002009-10-25T17:43:16.178-07:00Illusions of powerTo establish a requisite intricate intellectual <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">aperaddis</span> that can be used to eradicate indistinguishable obligation to trilateral commissions and ignorance and corruption of the technicalities of society. The world can not be a place of corrupt bureaucrats that are overpowered that deceive in the name of their occupational political obligations. Economic <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">equilibrium</span> must be perpetuated due to the fact of consolidation and weakening of individuals. If not,the small people will be unequivocally dependent on a higher society instead of giving back to consistency of inflation. Political representation of the western economic society are only illusions of the true love for power.alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-54317802217211006502009-06-23T02:06:00.000-07:002009-10-25T17:43:35.189-07:00collaboration of perversity<span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Applying</span> the nature of biological life to <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">science</span> fiction. look in at the complex machine of life as a perpetual cellular statistic <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">syntheses</span> that is <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">unthought</span></span> of because of the negligence of justification of ignorance in a "common current thought" or social demographic. <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Creating</span> fantasy in reality and reality in fantasy, turning a micro <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">biologist</span> in to a robot <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Doctor</span> or Einstein in to a cyberpunk. Fantasy and reality intertwined to create hypothesis to what is beyond reality. To collaborate the perversity of a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">systematically</span></span> <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">corrupted</span> generation that can find a higher consciousness through science and technology to procreate a more complex<br />"machine of life".alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4856098760982152174.post-22831657749608372212009-06-19T00:01:00.000-07:002009-08-11T15:41:59.535-07:00observations on the world around me.<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jtlC5ncH27w/Sjs4pyfU06I/AAAAAAAAAAM/7ghlJFUuB9w/s1600-h/A_copy_of_a_copy_of_a_copy_by_copperthistle.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5348931273011549090" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 262px" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jtlC5ncH27w/Sjs4pyfU06I/AAAAAAAAAAM/7ghlJFUuB9w/s320/A_copy_of_a_copy_of_a_copy_by_copperthistle.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div><br />We are told that we live and thrive off material possessions and that we see nothing beyond that. It is bare instinct to kill and have a source of nourishment. That is the only reason why we kill. And that is one of that main ways to maintain a neutral equilibrium with the planet. I am not relating to modern times,I am saying,you kill something,it falls to the ground,the earth can absorb that,and use it again. I am saying that in "the new world",we would do all but through technology,you don't have to kill something to survive. you can use chemical binary compounds to create you own nourishment. Then it would not be a significant enough for it to be necessary to maintain a equilibrium. that is why I want to leave the world to something exceedingly superior to humans,(A.I.)..hence forth leaving the earth to logic,reason,and knowledge. It takes individual thought to create something good in a unindividual world(our world), but then again, if you have a different thought, YOU GET KILLED. A different perspective and greed, are the only two things that can make one person hate one other. And from that you need people like John Lennon, but for example,In the "NEW WORLD" you have to make EVERYONE like John Lennon, because that people that hate him are not like him, so those people can't exist. I said that freewill and individual thought was a burden to the progress and evolution of the human race(in the new world).I have observed how much freewill we reilly have. (ONE) of the main current problems is the government, the government has power over the economy,the economy is the one reason for social mobility,social mobility is what stop you and me and everyone like us to have NO POWER! Freewill is a selfish,materialistic thing that empowers every person to not feel bad about us killing and taking advantage of everything around us. I mentioned that the human race is the example of a virus. Like a cancer of the Earth,we live on the host that we unconsciously are killing. For example if you put a virus in a person would you give that sickness freewill?? Would you let it spread all thorough the body and eventually kill it? So, I just would like you to reconsider how much freewill we really have. God and gods are examples of the human desire to be observed and understood giving us a sense of mortality. Everything is a matter of opinion, you can not make a utopia with material possessions but you can make a utopia with the perspective of the person, that is why I think people have to have ONE perspective. I know how most people cant see past the material possessions rule there life. Personally, I don't care about what people should do. I have thought about what the economy dose to people and what good it is doing. I think the economy should have never been invented because,(logically perceived),the economy is literally stopping human technological advancement, and basic evolution. The two reasons for the economy is social mobility,and the right to have people work for you,now, in one sense they are the same thing because if you have people under you, in a social feudal system you have worked to gain power above them, and that is creating discord in human society. That gives people the right to look down on other people and makes people unequal, and their for, creating hate between two different social classes. And what I mean by it stopping human technological advancement, is that if there was no type of currency, every one would be able to indulge in any technological luxury, no matter what social class they are in because there would only be one. For example, if you take a fancy car, it would not be considered fancy because everyone would have the newest "cutting edge" technology and that would maintain an economic equilibrium. I have no hope of this happening because greed already exists, and people would take advantage. But if money never existed there would only be one reason to fight wars, and that would be individual thought. </div>alphageek6788http://www.blogger.com/profile/10221041415859918712noreply@blogger.com2